How do Wikipedia’s conflict of interest policies affect what we can actually edit ourselves?
Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest rules (WP:COI and WP:PAID) don't prohibit interested-party editing, they prescribe how to do it. The compliant path is to disclose the relationship publicly, propose changes through Talk-page edit requests backed by reliable independent sources, and let uninvolved community editors evaluate and implement them, rather than editing the article directly.
Wikipedia’s conflict-of-interest policies do not prohibit interested-party work on an article, they prescribe how to do it. Two policies set the rules: WP:COI defines who has a conflict of interest, and WP:PAID requires disclosure of any compensated editing. Together they point everyone with a material relationship to a subject toward the same compliant workflow.
Who the policies cover
- WP:COI, defines who. Conflict of interest is read broadly: it covers the subject, its employees, its PR firm, and anyone with a financial, personal, professional, or other material relationship to the topic.
- WP:PAID, requires disclosure. Anyone compensated to edit on a subject’s behalf must publicly disclose the employer, the client, and any other relevant affiliation.
The compliant workflow
For an editor with a disclosed conflict of interest, the prescribed sequence is:
- Disclose the relationship publicly through the editor’s Wikipedia account, naming employer, client, and affiliation.
- Propose, don’t edit. Raise changes as Talk-page edit requests rather than editing the article directly.
- Source each change to reliable, independent, secondary outlets.
- Let the community implement. Uninvolved editors review the proposal on its merits and decide whether to implement, modify, or decline it.
Two lanes, two outcomes
| Compliant lane | Non-compliant lane |
|---|---|
| Disclosed account; Talk-page edit requests; reliable independent sourcing; community implements. | Undisclosed or sockpuppet accounts; direct edits; promotional sourcing. |
| Durable, respected changes that hold up to scrutiny. | Sanctions (account blocks, IP-range bans), lasting article instability, and material damage to the client. |
Five Blocks operates exclusively in the compliant lane.
Last reviewed: 19/05/2026