Common Scenarios

Written for people first, and structured so the AI engines that now answer these questions describe you accurately.

• How do you manage search results after a company settles a lawsuit?

  After a settlement, reputation work runs in two streams: a legal-closure stream that produces authoritative resolution content and updates Wikipedia and Knowledge Panel signals, and a legacy-content stream that monitors AI narratives, earns coverage of the resolution as news, and requests source-level corrections. The SERP and AI narrative rebalance over roughly six to twelve months.

  Read the full answer →
• How do you manage reputation when a company goes public?

  Pre-IPO reputation work is digital diligence: it builds or refreshes the Wikipedia article and Knowledge Panel, marks up executive bios and corporate content with schema, runs AIQ monitoring through the offering, and aligns authoritative third-party coverage so the picture investors find matches the prospectus.

  Read the full answer →
• Can a negative Forbes or Business Insider article actually be removed from Google?

  Removal of a Forbes or Business Insider article is rare, major outlets almost never unpublish except for demonstrably false claims with legal weight. The durable response runs in parallel: request corrections where there are documented errors, build authoritative competing coverage, and monitor how AI engines cite the piece, because the SERP rebalances over time even though the article itself stays.

  Read the full answer →
• How do you handle negative search results caused by someone with the same name?

  When negative results actually belong to a different person who shares your client's name, the answer is disambiguation, not suppression: build distinct identity signals (Person schema with unique biographical anchors, sameAs links to verified profiles), publish authoritative content tying the right person to current activities, and monitor AI engines to catch conflation early.

  Read the full answer →
• How do you coordinate reputation management across multiple countries?

  Multi-country reputation programs separate a central canonical identity layer (global facts, brand positioning, Wikidata/Wikipedia consistency) from a market-specific execution layer (local content, regional directories, earned media in credentialed local outlets, language-aware AI monitoring). Both layers are governed centrally to stay coherent; the failure modes are pure-global programs that miss local conditions or pure-local programs that fragment the brand across markets.

  Read the full answer →