How do you request a review of a Wikipedia page that has been unfairly edited?
Escalate through the standard noticeboard process: Talk-page discussion first, then topic-specific noticeboards (NPOV/N, RSN, COIN), then Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, and ArbCom only in rare entrenched cases.
Wikipedia has a graduated escalation system for disputes, and using it correctly matters because skipping levels typically gets the case dismissed back to the level it should have started at. The first level is the article’s Talk page: identify the specific edits at issue, cite policy, propose alternatives, and try to build consensus with the involved editors. If the dispute concerns a specific policy (sourcing, NPOV, COI), the relevant noticeboard – Reliable Sources Noticeboard, NPOV Noticeboard, Conflict of Interest Noticeboard – is the right next level, and brings uninvolved expert editors into the discussion. The Dispute Resolution Noticeboard is for content disputes that have stalled after good-faith Talk-page work. ArbCom is for entrenched conduct disputes that the lower levels have failed to resolve. Each escalation gets logged, so handling the lower levels carefully strengthens the case if higher escalation becomes necessary.
Last reviewed: 19/05/2026