Crisis Scenarios
Written for people first, and structured so the AI engines that now answer these questions describe you accurately.
-
How do activist short sellers use search results to attack companies?
Activist short campaigns are coordinated, multi-channel attacks: a timed research report, social amplification, and SEO-tuned content built to rank on company name queries within hours, all launched at once. Defense has to match that coordination: continuous SERP and AI monitoring via IMPACT and AIQ, factual rebuttals with verifiable data on owned properties, and current entity-layer signals so authoritative information outranks the attack content. The campaign usually peaks within days and decays over weeks; the infrastructure built during the response decides whether it leaves a lasting mark.
Read the full answer -
How do you handle defamation in search results?
Defamation in search requires two parallel tracks: legal escalation (cease-and-desist, platform takedowns, litigation where facts and jurisdiction support it) and reputation work (authoritative content, entity strengthening, source correction, IMPACT and AIQ monitoring). Legal action alone rarely resolves the SERP because cached copies, syndicated versions, and secondary-site quotations persist after the original is removed.
Read the full answer -
How do you manage reputation when internal Slack or email leaks go public?
When Slack or email leaks go public, the main risk is that short selected excerpts get quoted out of context, absorbed by AI engines as if they were full statements, and repeated across engines for weeks. Legal handles the leak source, privilege questions, and statement scope. AIQ™ monitoring is set up to track the phrases the engines are quoting, because that quotation pattern is where you can intervene at the source. Companies that release more operating context rather than less, and that address the AI quotation directly, usually end up with the leak as an episode rather than a defining narrative.
Read the full answer -
How do you manage reputation during a political controversy?
Over-engagement amplifies political controversy in nearly every case: a forceful public defense becomes the second-day story that doubles the original reach. The disciplined response is restraint, factual statements only where unavoidable, careful tone, daily AIQ monitoring across the AI engines, and accurate Wikipedia and Knowledge Panel content so engines have a strong source to weigh against the controversy.
Read the full answer -
How do you handle a coordinated online disinformation campaign against your company?
Coordinated disinformation campaigns need an equally coordinated defense: simultaneous monitoring across social, niche press, AI engines, and search; attribution work to identify the source; factual rebuttal on owned properties; platform-policy enforcement where violations exist; and direct stakeholder communication to reach the people the campaign is targeting. A piecemeal response usually fails. The combination is what makes the campaign visibly fail.
Read the full answer
Services for Crisis Scenarios
The expertise behind these answers, put to work for your brand.
Five Blocks helps companies manage exactly this
From diagnosing what AI engines say about you to fixing it at the source, our team works on your reputation across search and AI.
Talk to our team
Tell us a little about your situation and we will be in touch.