How does AIQ change crisis response?

AIQ changes crisis response by closing the feedback loop. In a traditional crisis workflow, the comms team issues a statement, places a story, then waits days or weeks to see what stuck. AIQ shortens that wait. By the day after a statement is issued, the engines have polled, and the platform shows whether the official version of events has entered the AI narrative.

What you can see the next day

• Did the official version land? Whether your statement and placements have entered the AI narrative, or the engines are still telling the contested version.
• Which sources are still driving the bad frame: the citations the engines weight toward the contested account.
• Where the engines diverge: how the picture differs from one engine to another.

Why source attribution is the leverage point

Knowing that ChatGPT is still telling the bad story is one thing. Seeing that a single older article drives a large share of the citations, and is therefore the place to act, is another. That source-level view is what makes monitoring actionable.

The speed advantage matters most when a situation moves daily. Instead of guessing for days or weeks, the comms team gets a fresh read each cycle on whether the narrative is correcting. We use AIQ on every crisis engagement we run.