How do you prevent Wikipedia from becoming a permanent record of a crisis?

Wikipedia articles are working documents, not stone tablets. The crisis section of a corporate article reflects the moment it was written; over time, as new credible sources cover the company’s recovery, the section can be updated, contextualized, and proportionalized within the broader article. The work happens through Wikipedia’s own processes. Talk-page edit requests with reliable secondary sourcing add post-crisis developments. Undue-weight challenges through Wikipedia policy address sections that overweight the crisis relative to the company’s broader history and operations. Neutral-point-of-view discussions rebalance language that has drifted from encyclopedic tone. Disclosed COI editing ensures the work runs within Wikipedia community norms. We do this work routinely as part of recovery programs and the cumulative effect over twelve to twenty-four months is consistently meaningful. Articles that look permanent at month one rarely look permanent at month eighteen when the work has been sustained.